My photo
Mendocino County, California, United States
The measure that has been placed on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors is called "Measure B." Please take a look around the blog and help us Save Mendocino County from the “no-limits” marijuana growing that is destroying our community.

YES on Mendocino County - YES on Measure B


MEASURE B-County




Total
Number of Precincts
235
Precincts Reporting
235 100.0 %
Times Counted
28192/47040 59.9 %
Total Votes
27946

YES
14577 52.16%
NO
13369 47.84%

Election Summary Report
COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
STATEWIDE DIRECT PRIMARY
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
JUNE 3, 2008 FINAL OFFICIAL RESULTS


06/20/08
09:41:00

VOTE YES ON MENDOCINO COUNTY MEASURE B

Thank you from the Yes on B Coalition

Quotes of interest

"...The problem in California is a lack of consistency in the law."

-- Tom Allman, Mendocino County Sheriff, when speaking on marijuana laws (Press Democrat 06/06/07)

“The citizens of Mendocino County deserve clarity with respect to marijuana cultivation limits and enforcement against abuses...”

-- Laura Hamburg, No on Measure B, (March 12, 2008)


On the question of marijuana & methamphetamine in Mendocino County:

DeVall,
Host

“…have you found an interconnectedness?”

Loren,
panel member,

“The connections that I’ve seen with methamphetamine and marijuana is…I was doing runs down to the city with pounds of weed to trade straight across for methamphetamine that I was bringing back, so to say ‘yes' it does fund some of the methamphetamines that are coming into this county, because to trade straight across I mean, we’re bringing huge amounts back for no cash. We are just growing weed and trading it…

--- KZYX , The Access Program live interview, Ukiah CA, 03/07/08

Section 9:
School, district and community barriers to improvements in student achievement:

"The prevalent use and societal acceptance of marijuana is a unique challenge to this area."

--- Dennis Willeford, Principal of Ukiah High School, Single Plan for Student Achievement at Ukiah High School report as revised November 7th, 2007 to the Ukiah Unified School District Governing Board.


"Growers have come to Mendocino County from out of state because they erroneously believe it's legal to grow marijuana there."

--- Susan Jordan, Attorney (Press Democrat 06/06/07)

Monday, June 2, 2008

Marijuana advocate votes yes on B

Ukiah Daily Journal Staff

To the Editor:

I believe that marijuana should be legal and available for medical, religious or recreational use and that there is no rationale for banning its use while allowing the consumption of alcohol and tobacco. This is why I have testified as an expert witness on the religious use of marijuana on behalf of three criminal defendants in three different states who claimed their use of marijuana was a religious sacrament. That was when my only exposure to the issue of marijuana was the use side of the equation and I knew little about the impact of its cultivation.

Now that I live in Mendocino County and see the damaging effects of unregulated marijuana cultivation I would not be able to take such a case again. You see, I have come to understand the problem with liberalizing use and cultivation while marijuana is still illegal nationally.

The problem begins with the fact that we do not exist in isolation. Our liberalization has been the opportunists' delight. By attracting people from all over the country that want to capitalize on the laisse-faire culture here, the make-up of the county has changed dramatically in the past few years. Short-term interests of the few trump the long-term commitments of the majority of us.

I do not always know what size operation people are thinking of when they refer to "large" commercial growers, but I know first-hand the problems that can come from a grower with several hundred plants -- all supported with "physician recommendations." Add up hundreds of these operations across the county and this has serious environmental impact. No one would be turning to look the other way if vintners suddenly took over entire hillsides with vineyards or every back yard had crops of coffee grown for export or a company decided to start an asphalt plant at the top of a major watershed. There are stringent regulations and mitigations such businesses would have to meet while producers in the marijuana industry remain free of oversight.

Those that argue that uncontrolled marijuana cultivation is harmless are either very lucky not to have been touched by its excesses, or they are disingenuous. I want to believe it is the former. Yet these very people make righteous claims as to their concern over the environment and people's rights while they look away as growers suck the water dry and bring in vicious dogs, guns, create hazardous fire conditions, contaminate soil and otherwise act solely in their self-interest and ignore the insult and danger to others. I have been saddened that the proponents of marijuana have not joined with their fellow community members to find solutions to these problems rather than demean and accuse them of making up stories. If you are not solely about profiteering and your very supporters have turned against you, it is time to look at the problem directly and seek solutions.

While seeking an alternative solution to prohibition, I have spent countless hours in conversations with concerned people trying to find a solution that satisfies everyone. I sat in many supervisors' meetings listening to neighbors describe their troubling experiences. Almost everyone I have heard speak on this issue -- publicly or privately -- has said they supported liberalization of marijuana and they are sad that it has become such a problem. From what I can see, people are concerned with the effects of widespread marijuana cultivation -- not the plant itself. They still support compassionate use of medical marijuana and do not seek its eradication -- so far.

My understanding from talking with attorneys and listening to discussions in the Board of Supervisors is that there is no legal means for the county to license, regulate, or tax what is still not legal (Prop 215 did not legalize marijuana in California.). Yet, every other industry is regulated and taxed so as to contribute to the community.

The sheriff and the district attorney have made it clear that they have no mandate, nor budget to pursue every pot grower in the county. And for those who create a nuisance or danger, they need more provision for addressing the problem. We need to be in line with the rest of the state on plant limits to take the pressure off our land, water, wildlife, and community.

If advocates for medical marijuana really want to protect its availability, it is time to work with the community to contain the situation and the abuses or the blow back will set the liberalization movement back 25 years. This is why I voted Yes on Measure B and urge you to do the same.

Deborah Pruitt, Ph.D.
Willits

No comments:

Measure B on the June ballot will provide:

-> That the amount of marijuana allowed for medical marijuana patients will be the same as the limit set by California State law.

The state limit, presently 6 mature plants and 8 ounces of processed marijuana per patient, will replace the higher 25-plant limit that has existed in Mendocino County since 2000. This will stop Mendocino County from being a “magnet" for marijuana growers who move here for quick profit.

-> That Measure G is repealed.

"Measure G ordered the sheriff to make enforcement of all marijuana laws his lowest priority, below even jaywalking. Prosecutions for less than 25 plants “per single case” was prohibited. Measure G discourages law enforcement and the Board of Supervisors from stopping abuses and threats to health and safety. Whenever the County tries to impose any limits on marijuana growing, the “no-limits” marijuana lobby threatens to sue for “violation of Measure G.”

Please send donations to

Yes On B Coalition
759 S. State Street #114
Ukiah, CA. 95482

YesOnB@pacific.net

Visit YES on Mendocino County Measure B Coalition for more information

Yes on Measure B - What's Happening?

June 3 -
Vote YES on Mendocino County Measure B

May 19 -
Last day to register to vote YES on Measure B.

Find my polling location. Enter your address and find your polling precinct and location.

Visit the Mendocino County Assessor - County Clerk - Recorder for more information.

May 7 - 7:o0pm
Measure B community forum
Location: Willits Grange.

May 5
Absentee ballots are mailed.

May 3 - 10:30am
Televised Measure B debate Coast League of Women Voters Measure B Community Forum.
Location: St. Michaels and All Angels Episcopal Church, Ft. Bragg.

May 1 - 6:00pm
Televised Measure B debate
Location: Mendocino Coast Television, Ft. Bragg

April 29 - 7:00pm
Anderson Valley Community Action Coalition
Location: Assembly of God - 14500 Highway 128 in Boonville

April 16 - 6:30pm
City Council meeting, City to vote on endorsing Measure B
Location: City Hall.

April 15 - 7:00pm
Ukiah Valley Chamber of Commerce / Candidates night
Location: City Hall.

April 14 - 6:30pm
Yes on Measure B debate
Location: City Hall.

Thank you for your support in
"Saving Mendocino County"

In our opinion

We want our county back

We've been hearing from readers that the level of outrage over marijuana growing in this county is continuing to rise.

The news of search warrants being quashed and pot growers walking away from court back to local neighborhoods to keep growing, of trucks and cars traveling up and down Highway 101 full of pot, of smart attorneys taking advantage of the mess that Measure G made of our county's desire to be fair to pot smokers and compassionate to the sick and dying, is all taking its toll.

When Measure G passed in the year 2000 the headlines in pro-marijuana publications read: "Marijuana growing legalized in Mendocino County, California!"

That is the message we sent to the world. That was not the message intended by many of the people who voted for Measure G back then and it is one we need to reverse by passing Measure B on the ballot in June.

What we're seeing in the news right now is a good example of why Measure B is so necessary. We need to return safety and sanity to our neighborhoods.

But perhaps most importantly Measure B will send a message back out into the world that Mendocino County is no longer the place to move to with your dreams of pulling in six figures a year tax free in a sweet deal made possible by the unwitting voters in Mendocino County who thought they were just giving a few local pot smokers a break.

In the coming weeks you will hear more about Measure B and you will hear from a group now organized to stop Measure B.

They will tell you Measure B will prevent medical marijuana patients from getting their medicine. False.

Measure B enacts locally the state standards for medical marijuana: six plants per patient. And remember when someone says "only six plants?" that one pot plant can be 10 to 12 feet tall and three to four feet wide. And they can have more immature plants, and they can get a doctor's recommendation if need be for even more. In other words, the state's regulations, developed by physicians committed to helping the sick and dying, concluded that six plants was plenty for any legitimate medical marijuana patient.

They will tell you Measure B criminalizes marijuana and "targets small-scale personal use growers." False.

Measure B simply reverses the excesses of Measure G, which gave everyone a license to grow as many as 25 pot plants continuously, year round, and led to the off-kilter notion that with the addition of dozens of medical marijuana cards, one could legally grow hundreds of plants anywhere in the county without fear of prosecution. That is where we stand today.

Don't let the "No on B" folks fool you. Measure B will indeed put a crimp on commercial marijuana production. They also argue that 25 plants is not a commercial growing operation. We differ. A 25-plant pot garden is not personal use. Much of that pot is being sold on the open market.

As the closure of the Ukiah medical marijuana dispensary this week showed, there are far more people growing "medical marijuana" than there are local medical marijuana patients.

If the news about the expanding commercial marijuana operations in this county disturbs you, if you support medical marijuana and even personal use, but not the outrageous abuses and the current pot traffic, then plan to vote Yes on B and make the message clear that we want our county back.

Argument in favor of Measure B

Marijuana cultivation in Mendocino County is clearly out of control. We have become a target for "no-limits" commercial marijuana growers who want quick profit and who care nothing about the impacts to our neighborhoods, our communities or the environment.

With the boom in commercial marijuana growing a crime wave has engulfed our communities. Home invasion robberies, trespassing, impacts to schools, and an influx of guns and attack dogs in residential neighborhoods are commonplace. Young people are increasingly turning to marijuana cultivation as a "career path."

Environmental damage from marijuana cultivation includes spills of diesel fuel and waste oil, dumping of trash, misuse of pesticides and fertilizers, illegal water diversion that has completely dried up some streams, poisoning of wildlife, damage to rural roads and strong odors that have sickened nearby residents.

What has caused this crisis? Much of the blame lies with Measure G, approved in 2000, that told law enforcement that all marijuana laws were the "lowest priority" for law enforcement, even lower than jaywalking.

Measure G discourages law enforcement from protecting us against even the most flagrant abuses by the commercial growers and sends a message to the nation that "marijuana is legal" in Mendocino County.

This has made us a magnet for "get-rich-quick" growers who hide behind medical marijuana as a "cover" for commercial marijuana production.

A "Yes" vote on Measure B does two simple things: it protects the rights of medical marijuana patients by adopting the same limits as state law and it repeals Measure G.

"Yes" on B tells law enforcement that we want protection against the abuses of the "no-limits" commercial growers.

"Yes" on B tells out-of-control growers that they are no longer welcome in Mendocino County.

Help save Mendocino County. Vote "Yes" on Measure B.

Duane Wells , Co-chairman, Yes on B Coalition
D.J. Miller, Co-chairman, Yes on B Coalition
Mari Rodin
Dave Bengston
Ron Orenstein

The rest of the argument

'NO ON MEASURE B' PRIMARY BALLOT ARGUMENT

Measure B is a backward step towards marijuana re-criminalization that targets small-scale, personal use growers instead of large-scale commercial operators and organized criminals who are actually causing the problems in Mendocino County.

In 2000, Mendocino County voters overwhelmingly approved Measure G, the Personal Use of Marijuana Initiative, which allows cultivation of twenty--five (25) plants or fewer for personal use only, while leaving commercial cultivation and sales illegal.

Measure B would 1) repeal Measure G so as to re-criminalize personal use growing, and 2) subject medical marijuana patients to arrest and prosecution on felony charges for growing more than six (6) plants, forcing many seriously ill people into the criminal market to get their medicine.

Mendocino County will not be made safer by cracking down on small personal use growers. Instead, it will be made less safe by diverting police resources. Sheriff Tom Allman has said that reducing patient plant guidelines to six plants would be "a burden on law enforcement" under which his deputies "will not be able to focus on any other public safety issue". (Press Democrat 3/17/07)

Mendocino County sorely needs to regulate large-scale gardens and to attack illicit grows and commercial trafficking. Measure B is a bogus diversion that does neither.

The solution is not to repeal Measure G (MCC9.36), but to seek ways to enforce it by regulating commercial growing.

If you support targeting large-scale criminal operations rather than personal use gardens, VOTE NO on B.

If you believe seriously ill patients should not be arrested for seven (7) plants, VOTE NO on B.

If you believe law enforcement has more important priorities than arresting and prosecuting small marijuana gardeners, VOTE NO on B.

If you support decriminalization of marijuana, VOTE NO on B.

B is Bad for Mendocino. Vote NO.

I swear under penalty of perjury that the above NO ON MEASURE B ballot argument is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signed by:
William L. Courtney MD
Catherine Babcock Magruder, Community Cultural Artist/Cancer Survivor
Keith Faulder, Attorney At Law
Peter Keegan MD
Lynda McClure, Union Representative
----------------------------------------------------------------

YES ON MEASURE B
REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE B

Don’t be fooled by false arguments and misleading quotations.

Measure B protects medical patients - not commercial growers.

The State recommended limits of 6 adult or 12 immature plants, plus ½ lb of marijuana, (more if physician recommended), is more than sufficient for seriously ill patients.

Sheriff Allman is neutral on Measure B, but previously said, “the problem in California is a lack of consistency in the law.” Recently, Sheriff Allman stated “Measure B will not change our focus. Investigating violent crime will remain our top priority. We do not, and will not, target small grows. We will continue to focus on large grows and complaints about growers who create a public nuisance, endanger public safety or trash the environment.”

“YES” ON B repeals Measure G which is inconsistent with state law, and makes Mendocino County a magnet for commercial growers who use medical marijuana as a cover for growing hundreds of plants.

“YES” ON B repeals G, which sanctions commercial quantities of 25 plants for everyone and tells law enforcement that ALL marijuana laws are the “lowest priority” and should not be enforced.

VOTE “YES” ON B - repeal G and end the hypocrisy that tells our kids it’s OK to break the law as long as you make money.

VOTE “YES” ON B - tell law enforcement and elected officials we want to feel safe in our homes and neighborhoods and we want our children and the environment protected from commercial growers who are motivated only by quick profit.
more information: www.YesOnBCoalition.org

s/Dave Turner, Fort Bragg City Council member
s/Karen Oslund, Willits City Council member
s/Marvin Trotter, M.D., Emergency Room Physician
s/Karin Wandrei, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mendocino County Youth Project
s/Robert Werra, M.D., Hospice Medical Advisor

FULL Text of Measure B

[Note: In response to a petition from 1,000 citizens, along with resolutions by the city councils of Ukiah and Willits, the Board of Supervisors acted on January 8, 2008 to place Measure B on the ballot at the June election for consideration by the voters.]

The People of the County of Mendocino ordain as follows:

THE REPEAL OF (MEASURE G) MENDOCINO COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 9.36 CANNABIS PERSONAL USE ORDINANCE FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY, AND ADOPTION OF NEW GUIDELINES FOR MAINTENANCE AND POSSESSION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA THAT DO NOT EXCEED THE MINIMUM STATE LIMITS.

Section 1 Purpose

The purpose of this ordinance is to eliminate the abuses created by the increased and uncontrolled production of recreational and medical marijuana while protecting the rights of legitimate medical marijuana patients and primary caregivers. It does so by repealing Measure G and establishing guidelines for possession of medical marijuana for medical purposes that are consistent with state law.

Section 2 Findings

1. On November 6, 1996, the people of the State of California enacted the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 known as Proposition 215, which permits seriously ill residents of the state, who have a doctor’s recommendation, to use or possess marijuana for medical purposes without fear of criminal liability. Proposition 215 is codified in Health and Safety Code section 11362.5.

2. On November 7, 2000, the voters of Mendocino County approved an initiative known as Measure G (administratively codified as Mendocino County Code Chapter 9.36), the stated purpose of which was to establish a maximum limit of plants and weight for cultivation and possession of marijuana for personal medical and recreational use in Mendocino County, and prohibit the expenditure of public funds for enforcement of marijuana laws against cultivators and users in possession of quantities below that limit, which was identified by the Measure as twenty-five (25) adult flowering female marijuana plants or the equivalent in dried marijuana.

3. On October 12, 2003, the Governor of the State of California signed SB 420. Codified in sections 11362.7 through 11362.83 of the Health and Safety Code, SB 420 was adopted to address implementation of Proposition 215 and to facilitate the prompt identification of qualified patients and their designated primary caregivers in order to avoid unnecessary arrest and prosecution of these individuals.

4. SB 420 establishes minimum guidelines for the maintenance and possession of medical marijuana. Health and Safety Code Section 11362.77(a)-(f) provides that a qualified patient or primary caregiver may possess no more than eight (8) ounces of dried marijuana per qualified patient and that a qualified patient or primary caregiver may also maintain no more than six (6) mature of twelve (12) immature plants per qualified patient. If a qualified patient or primary caregiver has a doctor’s recommendation that this quantity does not meet the qualified patient’s needs, the qualified patient or primary caregiver may possess an amount that is consistent with the qualified patient’s needs.

5. Health and Safety Code section 11362.77(c) allows counties and cities to retain or enact medical marijuana guidelines allowing qualified patients or primary caregivers to exceed the state limits.

6. On August 7, 2007, the Board of Supervisors, in accordance with Health and Safety Code section 11362.77(c) and recognizing the state purpose of Measure G as it related to medical use only, adopted a policy, which allowed qualified patients or primary caregivers to maintain twenty-five (25) plants and to possess no more than two (2) pounds dried marijuana per qualified patient.

7. The effect of Measure G has been to increase public safety issues surrounding the uncontrolled production of marijuana either for medical or recreational use, and has jeopardized the health, safety and welfare of the people of Mendocino County.

Section 3 Repeal of Mendocino County Code Chapter 9.36

Mendocino County Code Chapter 9.36, Cannabis Personal Use Ordinance for Mendocino County, is hereby repealed.

Section 4 Limits for Possession of Marijuana for Medical Purposes

A qualified patient or primary caregiver may possess or maintain for medical purposes only those amounts as set forth in Health and Safety Code section 11362.77 and as amended by State or Federal legislation.

Section 5 Severability

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance.