My photo
Mendocino County, California, United States
The measure that has been placed on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors is called "Measure B." Please take a look around the blog and help us Save Mendocino County from the “no-limits” marijuana growing that is destroying our community.

YES on Mendocino County - YES on Measure B


MEASURE B-County




Total
Number of Precincts
235
Precincts Reporting
235 100.0 %
Times Counted
28192/47040 59.9 %
Total Votes
27946

YES
14577 52.16%
NO
13369 47.84%

Election Summary Report
COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
STATEWIDE DIRECT PRIMARY
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
JUNE 3, 2008 FINAL OFFICIAL RESULTS


06/20/08
09:41:00

VOTE YES ON MENDOCINO COUNTY MEASURE B

Thank you from the Yes on B Coalition

Quotes of interest

"...The problem in California is a lack of consistency in the law."

-- Tom Allman, Mendocino County Sheriff, when speaking on marijuana laws (Press Democrat 06/06/07)

“The citizens of Mendocino County deserve clarity with respect to marijuana cultivation limits and enforcement against abuses...”

-- Laura Hamburg, No on Measure B, (March 12, 2008)


On the question of marijuana & methamphetamine in Mendocino County:

DeVall,
Host

“…have you found an interconnectedness?”

Loren,
panel member,

“The connections that I’ve seen with methamphetamine and marijuana is…I was doing runs down to the city with pounds of weed to trade straight across for methamphetamine that I was bringing back, so to say ‘yes' it does fund some of the methamphetamines that are coming into this county, because to trade straight across I mean, we’re bringing huge amounts back for no cash. We are just growing weed and trading it…

--- KZYX , The Access Program live interview, Ukiah CA, 03/07/08

Section 9:
School, district and community barriers to improvements in student achievement:

"The prevalent use and societal acceptance of marijuana is a unique challenge to this area."

--- Dennis Willeford, Principal of Ukiah High School, Single Plan for Student Achievement at Ukiah High School report as revised November 7th, 2007 to the Ukiah Unified School District Governing Board.


"Growers have come to Mendocino County from out of state because they erroneously believe it's legal to grow marijuana there."

--- Susan Jordan, Attorney (Press Democrat 06/06/07)

Showing posts with label support. Show all posts
Showing posts with label support. Show all posts

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Mendocino may complete pot vote count Friday - Measure B would repeal county's liberal marijuana cultivation guidelines

Published: Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 4:30 a.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 5:13 a.m.

Mendocino County election officials are still counting 10,385 absentee ballots from the June 3 election, results that will determine the outcome of a closely watched campaign to repeal the county's liberal marijuana guidelines.

"We hope to be done counting by Friday," said County Clerk Sue Ranochak.

But Ranochak said when the results will be formally announced is uncertain. "I just can't say until we're done," she said.

Interest in the Measure B vote outcome is still intense 16 days after the primary election, judging from the number of daily calls coming into Ranochak's office.

On election night, the county's election Web site crashed because of unexpected heavy volume.

The Measure B fight attracted state and national attention, and drew one of the heaviest local voter turnouts for a primary election despite a near-record low statewide average of 27 percent. Ranochak predicted when Mendocino's turnout is officially calculated, it will be above 50 percent.

Ranochak said Wednesday she's as eager to get the votes counted as people are to know the results. "We know how much interest there is, so we're working hard to get it done," said Ranochak.

On election night, Measure B appeared to win by a 52-48 percent margin. But most of the 16,364 ballots counted then were from the inland areas of Ukiah, Redwood Valley and Potter Valley, where there was strong support for repeal of county marijuana guidelines.

But with the final 40 percent of the vote now being counted, that pattern could continue a shift that began election night.

As the tabulation broadened, Measure B's margin of victory tightened significantly as ballots began to be counted from more marijuana-tolerant regions of the county, including the Mendocino Coast, Anderson Valley and Willits/Laytonville.

Because many of the 10,000 votes still uncounted are from those areas, Measure B's 701-vote victory margin could be overcome.

If Measure B passes, it would repeal current county standards decriminalizing possession and cultivation of up to 25 marijuana plants per person and adopt more restrictive state guidelines of six plants.

Measure B also repeals a directive to local law enforcement to make marijuana prosecution the lowest priority.

A recent state appellate court ruling has raised questions about Measure B's potential effectiveness.

The Los Angeles court ruled that state marijuana guidelines that Measure B seeks to impose locally are unconstitutional.

You can reach Staff Writer Mike Geniella at 462-6470 or mgeniella@pressdemocrat.com.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Man shot, marijuana plants seized near Iron Peak subdivision

Ukiah Daily Journal Staff

The Daily Journal

At around 11:30 a.m. Sunday, the Mendocino County Sheriff Dispatch received a call from the Iron Peak subdivision about a shooting that had taken place in a wooded area.

The victim, Roy Joseph Wentz Jr., 44, of Laytonville was reported to be shot in the arm and in need of medical treatment. Fire rescue responded and learned that Wentz had been shot in the arm and was flown to Santa Rosa Memorial hospital due to the extent of injuries, according to a statement issued by the Mendocino County Sheriff's Department.

During the investigation, it was discovered the victim had been visiting friends in the area and had gone for a walk. He was returned a short while later by a unidentified subject who advised he had found the victim shot. His friends then summoned help and took him to meet rescue personnel.

A search of the area was conducted by responding deputies and a possible crime scene was discovered. From this scene, evidence of the shooting and 150 marijuana plants were recovered and seized.

Wentz was at last report in and out of surgery and the case remains under investigation.

MCSO detectives are interested in speaking with the unknown person who brought the victim to his friends. Anyone with information is asked to contact the Mendocino County Sheriff's Detectives at 463-4411.

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Official and others react to initial reports of B's passage

Officials and others react to initial reports of B's passage


Click photo to enlarge

A U.S. Forest Service employee came upon this... (submitted by the Bureau of Land Management)

As the dust settles on a long and divisive campaign with unofficial results showing an apparent win for Measure B, both supporters and opponents feel the measure will help make the county a better place.

Measure B, which would repeal Measure G and set medical marijuana limits at six mature or 12 immature plants and eight ounces of dried marijuana, appeared to be passing early Wednesday morning with approximately 52 percent of the vote.

"The ability to obtain convictions on commercial growers will increase substantially," said Mendocino County District Attorney Meredith Lintott.

Ukiah Police Chief Chris Dewey said the apparent passage of Measure B will create a "consistent enforcement standard" in the county.

Lintott said she believed the new consistency in medical marijuana laws and the repeal of Measure G would create a "deterrence effect" that would keep people from coming to Mendocino County specifically to grow marijuana.

"The word will get out that Mendocino is not the place to grow marijuana," she said.

"We're hoping the people will self-regulate," Dewey said.

During the campaign, one of the primary arguments of the No on B Campaign is that it would make every medical marijuana patient growing seven or more plants a felon.

Mendocino County Sheriff Tom Allman said that is not the case.

"Legitimate medical marijuana will be respected," he said.

"The people who need to be concerned are the people who have been hiding behind Measure G and abusing the system," Allman said.

Similarly, Lintott said her office would concentrate on prosecuting large commercial marijuana growers and not legitimate medical marijuana gardens that are out of compliance by a few plants.

"I've never been one to care about the number of plants," she said. "I'm interested in the totality of the circumstances and whether or not it is a commercial grow."

Dane Wilkins, director of the Mendocino County chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said the apparent narrow margin of victory for Measure B should serve as a message to the community that there are a lot of people in the county who support the rights of medical marijuana users.

According to unofficial election results, 16,285 people voted on Measure B, with 8,493 voting for the measure and 7,792 voting against. There are still 439 provisional ballots to be counted.

Late Wednesday afternoon, the Elections Office issued a press release stating that in addition to the 439 provisional ballots, there are more than 10,000 mail-in ballots that were dropped off at polling places on Election Day and have not yet been counted (see accompanying article.)

Before the announcement of the still-to-be-counted ballots, Wilkins had said he hoped the close result would foster communication between the two groups.

"It's a good starting point to having a dialogue with the other side," he said.

Representatives from the California NORML office were more critical of the results. Dale Gieringer of NORML said the passage of the measure did not have the force and effect its supporters believe.

"The passage of Measure B settles nothing," he said. "Its major enforcement provision is invalid and it contains nothing that addresses the real problems of large-scale criminal cultivation. The county needs to go back to the drawing board."

Gieringer was referring to the California Appellate Court decision in People v. Kelly in which the court found that the medical marijuana limits of six mature or 12 immature plants and eight ounces of marijuana are unconstitutional because the Legislature cannot make changes to a voter initiative without the voters' approval.

Senate Bill 420 set the state limits, putting a cap on voter approved Proposition 215, which legalized medical marijuana but did not set a limit on the amount of medical marijuana a patient could possess.

Gieringer also criticized the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors for placing Measure B on the primary ballot, which he said traditionally has lower voter turnout and attracts older and more conservative voters.

All current election results are unofficial. Final results will not be available until the canvass is complete, which can take up to 28 days.

Ben Brown can be reached at udjbb@pacific.net.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

BREAKING NEWS: Voters say yes' on B: Marijuana reform measure approved


Click photo to enlarge

After six months of forums, discussions, political mailers and vigorous, and sometimes vociferous, debate, Mendocino County voters finally had the opportunity to say their piece on the future of the county's marijuana policy.

With 100 percent of the precincts reporting at 12:35 a.m. Wednesday, Measure B was winning 52.15 percent to 47.85 percent. The Elections Office recorded a 34.94 percent turnout for the election and counted 16,436 ballots.

Provisional ballots remain to be counted.

"We're very confident that we're going to win," Ross Liberty, spokesman for the Yes on B Coalition, said earlier in the evening.

Measure B repeals Measure G, the county's personal use marijuana law, and sets medical marijuana possession limits in Mendocino County at the state limits of six mature or 12 immature plants and eight ounces of dried marijuana.

Measure G was passed by county voters in 2000 and instructed law enforcement to make the prosecution of possession of 25 marijuana plants or fewer the lowest possible priority.

No on B campaign spokeswoman Laura Hamburg said early in the evening that she was optimistic and excited about the results despite the fact that initial reports showed Measure B passing by a margin of more than 10 percent of the vote.

"The early results are always brutal," she said. "It's the most conservative group."

While the measure appeared to be passing from the earliest returns, Liberty said he was disappointed with the margin. Liberty said a poll conducted before Measure B was put on the ballot showed it passing with 65 percent of the vote.

"It's important to win," he said.

"We will all have done a great disservice to this county if we lose," Liberty said.

As the evening wore on, Yes on B maintained its almost 11 percent lead, though it eventually narrowed to around 5 percent.

Hamburg said no matter what the results of the election were, it would be counted as a victory by No on B because the campaign had created a dialogue about marijuana in Mendocino County.

"What happens tonight is just one slice of it," she said.

Liberty acknowledged that the fight over Measure B had been a divisive campaign and that a dialogue between the groups would be good.

"We have more common ground than we tended to acknowledge during the campaign," he said.

Hamburg said representatives of both campaigns as well as public health and other county entities would be meeting soon to discuss what can be done to deal with the crime and environmental degradation that often surrounds illegal marijuana grows.

"The whole county says no to that," she said.

All results from election night are unofficial. The definitive results will not be released until a canvas of the votes is completed, which could take up to 28 days.

Ben Brown can be reached at udjbb@pacific.net.


Yes on B

Yes on Mendocino County Measure B
The Yes on B Coalition requests that any remaining "Yes on B" campaign signs be returned. Please contact yesonb@pacific.net

Thanks!

VOTE YES ON MENDOCINO COUNTY MEASURE B

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Mendocino voters repeal lenient pot policy

Kevin Fagan, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

(06-03) 22:44 PDT -- Mendocino County relinquished its crown as the nation's epicenter of pot leniency Tuesday, with voters decisively approving a hotly contested measure to limit residents to six plants apiece under the state's medicinal pot law.

With 85.5 percent of precincts reporting, Measure B had already locked up an unbeatable 55.5 percent of the vote. The measure - which repealed an initiative approved by county voters eight years ago allowing residents to grow as many as 25 pot plants for personal use - needed majority approval to pass.

Other jurisdictions in the United States allow more plants, but they are generally confined to a specific space and must be used medically. Under the eight-year-old Mendocino regulations, the 25 allowable plants can grow as large and thick as possible, and be used as the owner wishes.

When the county's regulations passed as Measure G in 2000, proponents said the rules would simply codify what had been happening for decades in the county - massive pot growth that made Mendocino part of Northern California's renowned "Emerald Triangle."

The generous standards made it easier for people to grow pot to be used as pain-relief medicine, advocates say. But many residents and law enforcement officials complain that the standards were abused by people growing hundreds of plants at home for commercial sale.

Under federal law, possession of marijuana is illegal in any amount. California's Prop. 215, approved by voters in 1996, allows marijuana for medicinal use and the state gives local government authority to regulate use.

Measure B Mendocino
88.5% of precincts reporting

Vote%
Yes5,215 55.5
No4,178 44.4

E-mail Kevin Fagan at kfagan@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page B - 8 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Charges urged in felling of trees for pot garden

Authorities say man chain-sawed 30 fir trees to bring more light to plants

Published: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 at 4:30 a.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 at 8:28 a.m.

A Willits-area man could face criminal charges for allegedly destroying 37 fir trees, some more than 100 years old and on public property, to provide more light for a medicinal marijuana garden.

"It looked like a bomb went off in the forest," said Mike Chapman, manager of the Brooktrails Community Services District, which oversees the forested Brooktrails subdivision adjacent to and just north of Willits.

Mendocino County District Attorney Meredith Lintott's office has asked for further investigation, but Lintott said Monday she recommends charges be filed against Peter Evan Godt, 32, for the damage.

Godt could not be reached for comment Monday.

Sheriff's officials said authorities called to Brooktrails in April found Godt using a chain saw to cut down the trees.

Godt, who holds a prescription for the medical marijuana he grows, said he was thinning the forest so a pot garden could get more sunlight, said Lt. Rusty Noe.

"It's a perfect case of entitlement," Noe said, noting that most of the trees were not on Godt's property.

Noe said that sense of entitlement has led to a backlash against marijuana growers in the county and to Measure B, an initiative on today's ballot seeking to limit the amount of marijuana individuals are allowed to grow.

About 15 of the downed trees were on Brooktrails' 2,600-acre public greenbelt, Chapman said. Ten were on a neighbor's land, and the remainder are believed to have been on Godt's property, he said.

Godt's fenced garden area also was in the public greenbelt, Chapman said.

Officials say Godt cut down about 30 trees, and those trees knocked down seven others as they fell.

Foresters continue to evaluate the extent of the damage, Chapman said.

Brooktrails board members and residents are outraged, he said.

"It's pretty blatant. This is the worst case of public vandalism I've ever seen," Chapman said.

Brooktrails is classified as a park, and none of its 4,000 residents is allowed to cut any tree over 6 inches in diameter without permission, he said.

The board does not allow large trees to be cut, Chapman said.

"We're trying to preserve our park," he said.

Chapman also said the downed trees, scheduled to be removed next week, pose a fire threat.

Godt told authorities he planned to burn the trees he'd cut, Noe said.

You can reach Staff Writer Glenda Anderson at 462-6473

or glenda.anderson@

pressdemocrat.com.

Monday, June 2, 2008

In our opinion - Vote YES on Measure B- Yes on Mendocino County

Ukiah Daily Journal Staff

Tuesday is the last day voters in Mendocino County will have to cast some very important votes.

In supervisor districts there are numerous candidates on the ballot and opportunity for change in both the 1st and 2nd District races in which we have endorsed Carre Brown and John McCowen respectively.

One of the most important votes on the ballot we believe however, is a Yes vote on Measure B. It is vital, even if you think Measure B will pass, or you have no supervisor race where you live, that you still make sure to use your mail ballot or go to the polls and vote Yes on Measure B. It is vital that we not only pass Measure B but pass it with a margin big enough to send the message that is at the core of Measure B's importance: Mendocino County is no longer a place where greedy pot growers are welcome to come and take advantage of our neighborhoods, our compassion for the truly sick and dying and our desire to live in a safe and generous community.

Measure B does two simple things: it repeals Measure G, the 25 plant per person personal use ordinance that led this county down the path to a commercial marijuana industry most who voted for Measure G had no idea would be the result. All we tried to do was give people an opportunity to grow a few plants in their back yard if they smoked a little dope. But Measure G, combined with new medical marijuana laws giving anyone with a medical marijuana card (now available on practically any street corner) provided a license to grow hundreds and thousands of plants under the guise of "compassionate" caregiving. In fact, however, those growers are selling their pot to the highest bidder and have created a marijuana industry that has brought a horrendous increase in crime and a breakdown of our rural county's security and economic future.

Last minute controversies over court decisions on the state's medical marijuana regulations make passing Measure B that much more critical. We are convinced that the state will prevail in the need to have uniform medical marijuana growing limits and it is important that our own county repeal Measure G now to put aside the idea that 25 plants is some magical number for our citizens. It is a number pulled out of the aIr by the Measure G proponents who admit is was simply the highest number they thought they could get away with.

Down to the very end of this election season we are still hearing the same tired misinformation from No on B:

The Measure B will make "criminals" out of medical marijuana patients. Medical marijuana patients are completely protected by Measure B under state regulations already in place in the majority of other California counties.

That Measure B will impede law enforcement. Over and over the No on B campaign has falsely made this claim even in the face of virtual unity in the law enforcement community that Measure B is an important tool for them to crack down on the commercial marijuana growing masquerading as medical marijuana. In fact, the No on B campaign so blatantly misused Sheriff Allman's comments on marijuana to imply that he opposed Measure B that he decided to endorse Measure B to make it clear that Measure B would in fact be good for law enforcement.

Measure B is simple, logical and necessary.

If you are among those who want our county back, vote Yes on Measure B.

Yes on Measure B

Ukiah Daily Journal Staff

To the Editor:

I am a progressive Democrat and I'm voting yes on Measure B. Why? I've seen the negative effects of commercial marijuana in my family, in my neighborhood and in this county. One issue that most concerns me is the future of our children. It seems to me we are raising them in a drug culture of easy money -- where regular education and career ambitions are just not worth the effort. Where skirting the law and a hardened attitude are the norm. I know I am watching this happen within my extended family for a second generation with a third generation coming up. The effect of the commercial marijuana industry on these family members has been crippling. At this point none of them are equipped to handle normal jobs or normal life.

There are now 80-plus local physicians signed up in support of Yes on B. When I saw this my curiosity led me to wonder: would there be a similar list of professionals working with children (i.e. teachers, law enforcement, psychologists) who'd be willing to state they see no negative impact from this drug culture on our youth? If we logically extend it out, by engaging in the commercial selling of marijuana how much of our children's futures have we also been selling away? And how are we impacting the lives and futures of children in other communities?

Mary Gustafson
Ukiah

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Police, local party leaders blast mailers; No on B says it didn't send them


The leaders of Mendocino County's Republican and Democratic parties, as well as Ukiah Police Chief Chris Dewey have issued a joint statement expressing outrage over mailers sent out in opposition of Measure B which they call misleading.

"We are outraged that the No on Measure B Campaign has purchased space on slate mailers that masquerade as official publications of recognized organizations," the three said in their statement. "These mailers are a deliberate attempt to fool the voters."

One of the mailers is marked "Attention Republicans," a second reads "Voter Information Guide for Democrats" and the third reads simply "Cops."

All three come with disclaimers that read that the document was prepared as a voters guide and is not the product of an official party organization. They also note that all appearances were paid for by each candidate or ballot measure.

Speaking individually, Dewey, Margie Handley of the Mendocino County Republican Party and Democrat Jim Mastin all noted their disapproval of the mailers.

"Every police chief in the county, the district attorney, the Highway Patrol commander, the Ukiah Police Officers Association and the Deputy Sheriff's Association endorse Measure B," Dewey said. "I'm not aware of anyone working in law enforcement who is opposed."

"It is outrageous that anyone would try to imply that the Republican party is opposed to Measure B," Handley said. "In fact, the Mendocino County Republican Central Committee has endorsed Yes on Measure B."

"It's election time, and we want every voter to become informed on the issue and then vote their conscience," Mastin said. "Local groups send out readily identifiable slate mailers that promote positions supported and endorsed by your neighbors and friends. Unfortunately it's also the season of the phony slate mailer. They are designed to deceive, misinform, remain anonymous and do it all for the highest bidder."

Laura Hamburg, spokeswoman for the No on B Campaign said the campaign was not involved with the mailers.

"We didn't pay for the mailers and we didn't have anything to do with the content," she said.

Though saying it was not involved, Hamburg said the campaign was glad to know there were opportunities for the No on B message to get out to Republicans and members of law enforcement who might be against Measure B, despite official endorsement of the measure by both of those groups.

Measure B, which was placed on the ballot by the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors in January, would repeal Measure G and set medical marijuana limits in Mendocino County at the state limit of six mature or 12 immature plants and eight ounces of dried marijuana.

Measure G, which was passed by Mendocino County voters in 2000, instructed law enforcement to make the prosecution of marijuana gardens of 25 plants or fewer the lowest possible priority.

The election is Tuesday.

Ben Brown can be reached at udjbb@pacific.net.

Saturday, May 31, 2008

Mendocino County Pot Growing Measure Nears Vote

POSTED: 12:29 pm PDT May 31, 2008

Opponents say they, too, want to evict large-scale, criminal operators. But they say Measure B won't address that issue and will instead go after the people who need medical marijuana.Voters in this rugged stretch of Northern California took marijuana laws to new heights in 2000, allowing residents to grow up to 25 marijuana plants for medical, recreational or personal use.

But eight years later, some are campaigning to scale back the law, saying it's time to weed out pot profiteers. "We want to take that welcome mat away," said Ross Liberty, spokesman for Measure B, which goes before Mendocino County voters Tuesday. "What (Measure) B does is redefines who gets arrested and the 'who' will be medical patients that are growing more than six plants," said Laura Hamburg, who became active in the No on B campaign after her medical marijuana garden was raided.

The issue offers a glimpse into the murky world of medical marijuana in California, legal under state law, banned by the feds, and according to some reports, bringing some serious green into the Golden State. Using marijuana for medical purposes has been legal in California since 1996, when voters passed Proposition 215. But that law had only a sketchy mechanism for how marijuana would be produced and dispensed. State lawmakers subsequently allowed counties to issue ID cards to protect medical users from being prosecuted by local authorities. Each cardholder is allowed to have up to a half pound of dried marijuana or six mature marijuana plants, although local governments can set laws exceeding the state's limits. Meanwhile, federal authorities, who never recognized Proposition 215 and deny that marijuana has medicinal properties, have won a number of legal showdowns over the measure.

In 2000, Mendocino County voters approved Measure G, which had a 25-plant limit and permitted personal and recreational use, the latter a symbolic gesture since neither state nor federal laws allow personal pot use. The new law, Measure B, would repeal Measure G and set plant limits at state levels. (It's not entirely clear what that will mean since state guidelines are at issue in a Southern California court case.

The No on B side interprets the case as undermining Measure B. The Yes side disagrees, noting the case is under appeal.) Sheriff Tom Allman says the problem with Measure G is it gave the impression marijuana had been legalized in Mendocino County. "There's this perception that we're just a bunch of Cheech and Chong marijuana growers up here," Allman said. Blessed by ancient redwood groves and bordered by a breathtakingly beautiful coast, Mendocino County has long also been famous as a source of high-grade pot.

Estimates on how much money is generated by marijuana in Mendocino County and statewide vary; officials say it's hard to come up with a definite total since so much of the industry is undercover. Figures from the state's Campaign Against Marijuana Planting (CAMP) show more than 220,000 plants were seized in Mendocino County last year, up from about 136,000 the year before. Statewide, CAMP reported seizures of 2.9 million plants with an estimated wholesale value of $11.6 billion.

Hamburg, the daughter of former Rep. Dan Hamburg, grows medical marijuana for herself, her mother and her sister as well as a neighbor. She was raided last year by deputies who said they found an excessive number of plants. The charges were later dropped, leaving Hamburg determined to "work as hard as I could, as much as I could, so that no one would have to experience what I went through, which was devastating." Hamburg says there's no correlation between state seizure figures and county plant limits, pointing out that CAMP stats show Mendocino County ranked fourth in 2007 seizures. No. 1 was sparsely populated Lake County, which follows the state minimum of six plants, with nearly 483,000 plants seized. She argues that it's not Measure G that spurs marijuana growth in Mendocino County but its climate, topography and the institutional knowledge gleaned from decades of marijuana farming.

But Allman and others say cannabis became a lot less covert here after Measure G passed.
"It's in your face bad," said Allman.

These days, residents complain they can't sit in their backyards because the smell of the next-door marijuana patch is so strong, the sheriff said. In August, said Liberty, "it smells like pot everywhere. It just reeks." On the other side of the Measure B issue are George and Jean Hanamoto. Lavender and other carefully tended shrubs bloom in their attractive front garden on a wooded hillside in Mendocino County. And in the back yard are their marijuana plants, their characteristically spear-tipped leaves turned to the sky. Hanamoto, who is 74 and uses marijuana to relieve glaucoma and for back pain, said cutting plant limits to six would hurt people like him because growing conditions mean he can't always get the maximum out of each plant. Allman says the Hanamotos aren't the kind of people he'll be sending deputies after. He said he will continue to concentrate on large operations. Beyond that, "I want the rest of the state and possibly the nation to say, `Wow, we can't do whatever we want in Mendocino County,"' he said. But the Hanamotos aren't won over by arguments that Measure B will deter criminal operators. "The laws are there already," said Jean Hanamoto. "This is just to squash the little guy."

Friday, May 30, 2008

Just a house in the hills - until the raid

Friday, May 30, 2008

Authorities raid two houses north of Ukiah, Calif., on We... ""Yes on Measure B" coalition co-founder Ross Liberty is ... Marijuana grower Ukiah Morrison, candidate for Mendocino ...

(05-30) 04:00 PDT Calpella, - -- Mendocino CountyThe house looked like any other in the hills overlooking Lake Mendocino: neatly painted blue walls, a redwood deck spreading into a yard of raked dirt and stones, a tidy shed to the side of the driveway.

Then the 12-man major crimes task force kicked in the doors one day earlier this month at twilight, screaming, "Police Department, search warrant!" And it became clear this was no house for living.

It had been gutted and transformed into an indoor farm for at least 270 marijuana plants.

Ranging from 1 to 5 feet high, the plants were arrayed throughout the house beneath 27 heat lamps. A wall-size display of 130-watt fans and air-conditioning engines blasted cold air through hundreds of feet of piping to keep the temperature at 71.4 degrees.

And that didn't count the trailer a few hundred feet up the hill, where a similar arrangement nurtured 250 small starter plants. Or the 50-kilowatt diesel generator in that tidy shed fitted with hidden, insulated walls to muffle its around-the-clock roar.

All told, arresting officers estimated it must have cost at least $100,000 to set up the house. The pot had an estimated street value of at least $1 million.

"Pretty typical for what we see around here," said Robert Nishiyama, commander of the Mendocino Major Crimes Task Force, as he surveyed the operation. "It's not really that big."

Authorities destroyed a record 333,000 plants in Mendocino County last year, 100,000 more than the previous year.

Nishiyama and his team hit an operation like this about three times a week. Nishiyama, a special agent with the state Department of Justice, estimates that even if local law enforcement ran raids every day, they would still only get a fraction of the market - and they now seize less than 20 percent.

"It's everywhere," he said. "We don't even bother with the small stuff."

At the raided house, 35-year-old Jason Smith sat morosely on the deck steps, hands cuffed behind his back. He was the only one at the house when it was raided.

"I'm not at liberty to talk about this," he said, gazing up at the deputy guarding him. His eyes hardened.

"I will say this, though," Smith said. "We kill people in other countries for oil, we have pharmaceutical companies abusing people for billions of dollars - and then you have a naturally growing herb that can be used for medicine.

"It doesn't make sense to criminalize it," he said. "No sense at all."

Since local pot regulations were relaxed in 2000, Mendocino County pot cultivation has exploded to new highs - and with it have come new headaches.

Police say there has been a proliferation of home invasion robberies, which they blame on drug dealers ripping off pot growers. In 2000, authorities countywide recorded 1,100 pot-related criminal offenses; last year there were 1,500. Fire officials estimate 40 percent of structure fires are now ignited by super-hot indoor pot-growing lights.

"A decade ago, marijuana was really only grown in the hills," said Ukiah Police Chief Chris Dewey. "Now it's everywhere. We've been arresting growers who came here from Florida, New York, Texas, Chicago - you name it. People are fed up."

-Kevin Fagan

Authorities raid two houses north of Ukiah, Calif., on Wednesday, May 14, 2008, seizing hundreds of marijuana plants and growing equipment worth nearly 100.000. Daily raids are part of the background as Mendocino County residents prepare to decide on controversial Measure B, a proposal to outlaw the growing of more than six medicinal marijuana plants.

Photo by Kim Komenich / San Francisco Chronicle

Pot is burning issue on Mendocino ballot

Kevin Fagan, Chronicle Staff Writer

Friday, May 30, 2008

(05-30) 04:00 PDT Mendocino County - --

Marijuana is so ubiquitous here that everyone, from schoolteachers to kids, can tell you when a sinsemilla bud is ripe. From late summer to fall, the county reeks with the skunk-like stench of ready-to-harvest weed. The annual $1.5 billion pot crop constitutes two-thirds of Mendocino County's entire economy.

"You tell people from other parts of the country that folks grow pot all over town, and they think this is just a freak show here," said Ross Liberty, who owns a welding shop in Ukiah. "They're not far off."

Earlier this year, Liberty and others who used to be benign about the issue decided enough was enough. They put Measure B on Tuesday's ballot to repeal the nation's most liberal rules for growing pot, which for eight years have allowed anyone to grow up to 25 plants for personal use. If Measure B is approved by a majority vote, the per-person limit will revert to the statewide limit of six plants.

But then there's the other side.

Opponents of Measure B call it a meat-ax approach to an emotionally volatile issue and say that going after the weed in Mendocino's backyards and spare rooms is wrongheaded at best, cruel at worst. What is really needed, they argue, is a better effort to eradicate large-scale plantations that are hidden in the heavily forested mountains and are guarded by thugs toting assault rifles.

The anti-measure forces are led by an ex-congressman's daughter who was busted and later cleared for growing a medical pot garden.

"We need to harness this gigantic industry, not try to kill it," said Laura Hamburg, whose arrest last fall so infuriated her that she decided to head up the anti-Measure B push. "There's this caricature about this county that we're all hippies sitting around smoking joints, but that's the last thing from reality. Medical users truly need this plant."

The homegrown weed in most of those yards and rooms is medicine to be used by those who grow it, Hamburg said, or sold to the 400 medicinal marijuana clinics in San Francisco, Berkeley and the rest of the state. These grow-farms are not the problem, she insisted - flashy out-of-towners are.

Advocates disagree

But that's a key assertion with which Measure B advocates vehemently disagree. And to illustrate how bad they think neighborhood pot farms have become, they point to a 2004 incident in Ukiah.

That's when a would-be robber leaped the fence of Larry Puterbaugh's back yard and shot and wounded his neighbor, Memo Parker. The man was trying to steal from Parker's pot farm, police said. Puterbaugh had already complained for years about the stench from the hundreds of pot plants over his back fence - but even after the shooting, police did nothing about it. Parker had doctor-signed cards authorizing medicinal growth on the farm.

Parker later pleaded no contest to cultivating too many plants in a separate case. But in 2004, all Puterbaugh could do was fume.

"That's when I began thinking we have to do something," Puterbaugh said. "Why should we be scared in our own neighborhoods, in a quiet town like this?

Measure B backers date the genesis of their troubles to 2000, when 58 percent of the county's voters passed Measure G, which allowed anyone to grow as many as 25 marijuana plants for personal use - far exceeding the state guideline of six plants per person for medicinal use only.

The "personal use" reference, in practice, has meant growing for medical use - but the kicker for critics was that each lot of 25 plants required only a doctor-signed permission card saying the grower would use the pot or that the grower was cultivating it for another patient. Some houses began displaying as many as 12 cards, leading to complaints that the new rule was allowing people to grow commercially for cash, not medicine.

"It's like we kicked the door open and said to the rest of the nation, 'Come on in and grow pot!' " said Mike Sweeney, an environmental activist who is helping direct the Measure B campaign. "Now, what we want to do is slam that door shut. We want people around the country to know that Mendocino has changed its ways."

One who answered Mendocino's siren call is Ukiah Setiva Morrison. After hearing in North Carolina about the area's legendary pot leniency, he changed his name from Ronald Matthews and, in 2005, moved to Ukiah to run a short-lived church called the Hemp Plus Ministry.

"I really believe that cannabis isn't bad for you - stupidity is bad," he said, standing in his garden of 11 outdoor plants in Redwood Valley. Now he is running for county supervisor.

Measure B's proponents and opponents agree on one thing: the necessity for a prohibition on large pot farming operations, some of which sport as many as 500 plants, no matter where they are.

But as for crimping everything back to a six-plant limit? A popular local T-shirt speaks for Measure B opponents. "Let It Grow," it reads below a jaunty pot-leaf drawing.

Hamburg points to her own 39 plants - which were ripped out by police last fall - as an example. They were used as medicine for an intestinal condition as well as for her cancer-survivor mother and two others, and she had doctor-signed growing cards to justify the garden - which the search warrant didn't note, an omission that led a judge to throw out the case in March. It was a typical-size "grow" for the county.

However, Hamburg's political profile was anything but typical, and she thinks that's why she was targeted. Hamburg's father, former Democratic Rep. Dan Hamburg, helped lead the 2000 campaign that liberalized the county's pot laws, and she spearheaded the 2004 drive that passed the nation's first local ban on growing genetically altered food. Hamburg also worked as a reporter at The San Francisco Chronicle in 1997 and 1998.

"I wasn't going to be 'the pot girl,' leading this campaign, but that all changed when 11 deputies tore out my plants and locked me out of my own house," she said. "Now I just want to make sure that never happens to anyone else."

Legalize pot, they say

Hamburg and other Measure B opponents say that instead of limiting pot, Mendocino should be a beacon for the decades-old movement to legalize the $3,000-a-pound weed. The county's liberal guidelines are just that - guidelines tacitly respected by federal officials who still operate elsewhere under U.S. law banning pot of any quantity. But if it were legalized instead of demonized, Hamburg's group maintains, the economically struggling county could tax that $1.5 billion crop and become hugely prosperous.

"This whole fight is like Prohibition," said artist Catherine Magruder, a cancer survivor who says smoking pot erased the pain of chemotherapy. "You can't squish marijuana out of existence, it's too late. So why not figure out, together, how to make it work for all of us? And why not start that movement right here in Mendocino?"

Not surprisingly, considering how firmly pot culture is laced through this county, even Measure B proponents - who include virtually every elected or law enforcement official - say they support medicinal marijuana. The Board of Supervisors and many of those pushing for the rollback supported the lenient rules when they passed in 2000.

But now they say Hamburg and her backers - mainly patients, small-time growers, doctors, the San Francisco office of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Law (NORML) and a former county prosecutor - are deluded.

"What really got to me was when I tried to hire some teenagers for my shop and they laughed at me," said Liberty. "They said they make so much money harvesting pot for growers that they don't need my $8-an-hour jobs.

"Look, they can make $30 an hour, and I see them driving $50,000, tricked-up trucks all over town," he said. "I can't compete with that. Nobody can. How in the world can we attract new business when the workforce just wants to grow or harvest pot?"

There's more at stake here than just local regulations.

"This is the only battle going on in the entire country about marijuana cultivation, and anyone who cares about this issue in the United States is watching it very closely," said Dale Gieringer, California director of NORML.

Lots of money

Marijuana has been a significant presence in this county since the 1970s. Though grapes are the big legal crop here, Mendocino, Humboldt and Trinity counties are fabled as the "Emerald Triangle," considered by many to be the premier pot-growing region in the nation.

But at the same time, the area has an outdoorsy charm that draws not just environmental progressives but families hunting the kind of solitude that can be found only in a Rhode Island-sized county with 88,000 residents and four small incorporated communities. With the collapse of the local timber industry, poverty here is slightly worse than the state average, but the restored Victorians and tidy ranch houses in most towns and county roads reflect recovery more than despair.

The only immediate sign to outsiders that there's more going on here than simple rural living is the preponderance of shops selling pot-growing equipment and the occasional sign extolling the virtues of the herb. One of the first sights greeting drivers rolling into Ukiah is the Adopt-A-Highway sign proudly proclaiming cleanups by the "Medical Marijuana Patients Union."

"We definitely go our own way," said longtime resident Randy Bream, leaning against the till at his Mendocino Hobbies shop in Ukiah. "Look, I call myself a conservative, and I don't care who grows pot as long as they don't push it on me or my kids.

"What matters for me is that there are friendly people here. On Memorial Day, the city puts flags up and down the main street. All this fighting over pot? I wish they'd just hurry up and decide whether it's legal so we can stop talking about it."

Inside Uphill battle: Authorities say they manage to seize only 20 percent of Mendocino County's marijuana crop. A8

Info on B

For more information on Measure B:

Text of Measure B: www.yesonbcoalition.org/fullmeasureb.php.

E-mail Kevin Fagan at kfagan@sfchronicle.com.

Marijuana 'grow houses' are creating problems in Arcata, California

By Tim Reiterman and Eric Bailey, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers
7:15 PM PDT, May 30, 2008

Burned

About $55,000 in damage was caused in this rental house in Arcata, Calif., where marijuana was being grown and a piece of equipment started a fire. The owner didn't know how the house was being used.

Officials estimate as many as 1,000 of the 7,500 homes in town are used for pot, reducing housing stock and creating building-safety problems.
ARCATA -- LaVina Collenberg thought she had ideal tenants for her tidy ranch-style home on the outskirts of this university town nestled in the redwoods of the North Coast. Then the 74-year-old widow received an urgent call last September from a neighbor, who said firefighters had descended on the house she had rented to a pleasant young man from Wisconsin.

Collenberg found her charred and sooty rental filled with growing lights and three-foot-high marijuana plants. Seeds were germinating in the spa. Water from the growing operation had soaked through the carpeting and sub-flooring. Air vents had been cut into the new roof. A fan had fallen over, causing the fire.

"It was the first time I had been in a grow house," Collenberg said. "I had heard about them but never thought I had one. I was completely shocked."

Law enforcement officials estimate that as many as 1,000 of the 7,500 homes in this Humboldt County community are being used to cultivate marijuana, slashing into the housing stock, spreading building-safety problems and sowing neighborhood discord.

Indoor pot farms proliferated in recent years as California communities have implemented Proposition 215, the statewide medical marijuana measure passed overwhelmingly a dozen years ago. A backlash over the effects and abuses of legally sanctioned marijuana growing has emerged in some of the most liberal parts of the state.

For example, in neighboring Mendocino County, a measure on Tuesday's election ballot seeks to repeal a local proposition passed eight years ago that decriminalized cultivation of as many as 25 pot plants.

The experience of Arcata, a bastion of cannabis culture, reveals the unintended consequences of the 1996 Compassionate Use Act, designed to provide relief to AIDS patients, cancer victims and others.

"If the average citizen . . . could see what I see, they probably would vote against it now," Police Chief Randy Mendosa said of Proposition 215. "We are seeing large-scale grow operations where greedy people are taking huge amounts of affordable housing and are using entire houses to grow marijuana. The going rate is $3,000 a pound [wholesale] and they are selling it and making a huge amount of money."

State officials say such problems exist throughout the state, including Southern California, but are particularly prevalent in northwestern counties that have relatively liberal limits on possession and cultivation of medical marijuana.

"People who clearly are in it for profit see it as a loophole and have flooded into these areas from across California and the U.S.," said Kent Shaw, assistant chief of the state Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement. "What comes along with it is criminal elements who want to come and steal marijuana," sometimes through home invasion robberies.

Medical marijuana advocates say problems have been isolated, and they question the validity of attempts to link crime to a medicine. "Law enforcement sensationalizes a lot of the issues around growing and dispensaries," said Kris Hermes of Americans For Safe Access.

A doctor's recommendation is required for a medical marijuana patient to use, grow or acquire cannabis. Activists estimate there are more than 200,000 patients statewide.

In Arcata's leafy neighborhoods, residents and officials say the telltale signs of grow houses are evident: No full-time dwellers, blacked-out windows, scruffy yards, comings and goings at night. Then there's the skunk-like odor of marijuana and the whirring fans and electricity meters that generate thousand-dollar monthly power bills.

So many houses have been converted into pot farms that the availability of student rentals has been reduced and the community's aura of marijuana is turning off some prospective students, said Humboldt State University President Rollin Richmond. "My own sense is that people are abusing Prop. 215 to allow them to use marijuana . . . as recreational drugs," he said.

Arcata Mayor Mark Wheetley said marijuana growing has become a quality-of-life issue in the town of 17,000. "People from all camps say enough is enough," he said. "It is like this renegade Wild West mentality . . . I think people want to see a greater level of control and oversight."

Mark Sailors, 37, a medical marijuana patient and caregiver who moved here from Baltimore, said the community is overreacting. "They claim to support 215, and do not want you to have access to medicine," he said. "It sounds like the older people . . . are afraid of the younger."

The largest of the city's four pot dispensaries is the Humboldt Cooperative, known as THC, the abbreviation for the psycho-active chemical component in marijuana. Officials say the nonprofit at a former auto dealership has 6,000 registered patients, 2,000 of whom are currently eligible to buy weed, and that it has paid roughly $500,000 in taxes over the last five years.

The dispensary grows marijuana in an on-site warehouse and buys additional pot from about 100 patients, the majority from outside Arcata, who do not need all they have grown under Prop. 215.

THC founder Dennis Turner said many residential growing operations amount to "full-on crime " and he said he would welcome more regulation for dispensaries, particularly to protect marijuana quality. "There are holes in this [Proposition 215] like a piece of Swiss cheese," he said.

The City Council recently issued a moratorium on new dispensaries downtown, on grounds that agriculture is not permitted there. New land-use guidelines also are in the works.

Officials say secretive marijuana operations in houses are their highest priority for increased regulation. They say they do not know how many people are violating the county's legal requirements limiting them to 100 square feet of leaf canopy and as many as 99 plants -- provisions that may be invalidated by a recent state appellate court decision.

Community development Director Larry Oetker said the city does not even know the locations of grow houses because growers tend not to get permits for electrical and plumbing work. Oetker said they fear prosecution by federal authorities who do not recognize the state's medical marijuana law. "The concern is . . . the federal government will use city records to go bust the people."



Some growers have cut holes in floors so plants can go directly in the ground below, officials say. And many use jury-rigged wiring and extension cords that overload electrical circuits.

Arcata Fire Protection District Chief John McFarland says that most local structural fires involve marijuana cultivation -- and that after a fire starts, it often spreads quickly through holes cut for ducts, pipes and wires.

Wade DeLashmutt, a carpenter who had voted for Proposition 215, said he complained for many months about marijuana odors that hovered over his backyard after a man from Montana moved next door.

But the neighbor contended that it was medical marijuana. "He said, 'The voters of California said I could do this,' " DeLashmutt said.

In March, the county drug task force arrested the neighbor and another man after hundreds of marijuana plants, $12,000 and 27 pounds of processed pot were seized at the home and another in town.

Humboldt County Dist. Atty. Paul Gallegos said his office does not keep statistics on prosecutions for marijuana growing in Arcata. But Gallegos said he would prosecute any growers who posed a safety hazard to neighbors, a public nuisance or environmental harm.

"If you converted a house to grow dandelions, petunias and roses, my concerns would be the same," he said.

LaVina Collenberg wishes she had known that her friendly young renters from Wisconsin intended to turn her house into a marijuana-growing cooperative. Her insurance paid $55,000 to repair the damage from the fire and modifications.

The former tenant did not respond to calls seeking comment. Dr Ken Miller, who issued the tenant's medical marijuana recommendation, said he did not recall the patient.

A petition campaign dubbed "Nip It in the Bud" is asking the City Council to bar marijuana growing and dispensing from residential and public gathering areas.

The neighborhood ban is overdue, said 82-year-old Wilma Johnston.

"We are becoming a community of rentals for marijuana plants instead of people," she said.

tim.reiterman@latimes.com

eric.bailey@latimes.com

Six arrested in Ukiah marijuana raid


Six people, including a Ukiah Daily Journal reporter, were arrested Thursday in a multiple residence marijuana bust that netted close to 80 plants and 22 pounds of processed marijuana, according to the Mendocino Major Crimes Task Force.

Nathan Wickleffe, Shannon Wickleffe, Terry Wickleffe, Kathy Wickleffe, Zack Sampsel and an unnamed sixth man, were all arrested on suspicion of possession of marijuana for sale, cultivation of marijuana for sale, maintaining a place for drug sales and conspiracy.

Officers searched the Tedford Avenue home rented by Shannon Wickleffe, daughter of Terry and Kathy Wickleffe, and her fiance, Sampsel Thursday afternoon and found 50 growing marijuana plants, said MMCTF Commander Bob Nishiyama.

Sampsel is a reporter for The Ukiah Daily Journal covering primarily features and city government.

"Journalists, whether at a small local newspaper like ours or at the New York Times, are held to a very high ethical standard - and not just about the stories they write. Any time that breaks down is very disappointing for those of us trying to do the best job we can," said Daily Journal Editor K.C. Meadows. "Given the information we have, I'd say this is another example of the extreme problem that the marijuana culture in this county presents to local employers."

Officers were led to the Tedford Avenue home through their investigation into Shannon Wickleffe's brother, Nathan Wickleffe, who they suspected of growing and selling marijuana, Nishiyama said.

Officers got search warrants for three residences connected to Nathan Wickleffe, one on North State Street and two on Observatory Avenue.

Officers searched all three residences and found evidence of indoor marijuana grows, including one apartment in the 200 block of Observatory that had been turned into a grow room. Officers also seized 24 marijuana plants and at least six pounds of marijuana.

Nathan Wickleffe was paying for the electricity on all three residences at a cost of around $2,000 per month at each home, Nishiyama said.

Further investigation led officers to a home on Fir Terrace owned by Nathan Wickleffe's parents, Terry and Kathy Wickleffe. Nishiyama said officers found 16 pounds of packaged marijuana in the house, as well as evidence of an extensive indoor marijuana grow.

"It is my belief that they were probably growing there for a couple of years," he said.

Nishiyama said Terry and Kathy Wickleffe were growing roughly five pounds of marijuana every 60 days.

"They keep one to two pounds and sell the other three," Nishiyama said.

He said the two were selling the marijuana for around $3,000 per pound.

Investigation there led officers to the Tedford Avenue address.

Shannon Wickleffe told officers that she and Sampsel were growing about two-and-a-half pounds of marijuana every two months, keeping around half-a-pound and selling the rest, Nishiyama said.

"They would sell it, either to the cannabis club in Talmage or in Lake County," he said.

All of the suspects claimed to have a medical recommendation for the marijuana they smoked, Nishiyama said; only Sampsel provided officers with a doctor's recommendation.

Nishiyama said it does not appear there was any "ringleader" managing all of the gardens but said everyone in the family appeared to know what was going on.

"It was a family thing," he said. "Everyone seemed to know who was doing what."

All of the suspects were arrested on the above listed charges and booked into the Mendocino County Jail.

Ben Brown can be reached at udjbb@pacific.net.

VOTE YES on Mendocino County - YES on B


To the Editor:

We all know by now that 25 plants is way beyond what a legitimate medical marijuana patient needs.

So. What happens to the excess marijuana? Do they donate it to San Francisco cooperatives out of the kindness of their hearts? I think probably some kind people do. At least I would like to think that and I wholeheartedly commend them for their service. Sadly, I believe this isn't the norm. Also, by now we know 25 plants is a highly lucrative amount. Marijuana grows huge in Mendocino County and people know how to grow it big indoors and out. Don't be fooled by "It depends on how good the grower is," etc. Most of those who sell their "excess" to these San Francisco cooperatives are making big bucks. When they are arrested for growing "just a few extra plants" their high-priced lawyer declares, "This is an outrage" and nobly says he'll defend his client pro bono. He predictably invokes Measure G for his defense. When commercial growers hide behind medical marijuana it is at the expense of legitimate medical marijuana patients and caregivers. This abuse of the well-intentioned Measure G is what may well turn out to be its demise. Please vote Yes on Measure B.

Cathy Finigan
Ukiah



To the Editor:

June 3, voting date, is rapidly approaching. On the ballot is an extremely important measure for the citizens of Mendocino County -- Measure B. Measure B will repeal Measure G and set limits on the amount of marijuana that can be produced in the county. I have faith that the sane and responsible citizens of Mendocino County will examine Measure B and see that it is good for the county and not bad as some would lead us to believe. You will vote yes on the measure.

The main objection to Measure B is that it will restrict the number of marijuana plants that can be grown and harm the medical marijuana patient. From the voter's pamphlet, in their argument against Measure B, the opponents of Measure B have written that Measure B will, "subject medical marijuana patients to arrest and prosecution on felony charges for growing more than six plants, forcing many seriously ill people into the criminal market to get their medicine." That is about the furthest stretch from the truth that you can get. From the same voter pamphlet in the section, "Full text on Measure B," subsection four, are remarks about Senate Bill 420. SB 420 sets the limit for the state as, "six mature plants or 12 immature plants per qualified patient's needs." This provision of law provided by SB 420 ensures protection for the medical marijuana patient and ensures that the qualified patient will get enough marijuana for their medical needs.

The opponents of Measure B would like for you to believe their fabrication over the provision of law provided by Senate Bill 420. Which will you believe, the Senate Bill 420 or the fabrication made by the opponents to Measure B? What Measure B will do is reduce the immense tonnage of marijuana that is available in Mendocino County. Let us look at some more math and examine again the emperor's new clothes and the naked truth about marijuana produced in Mendocino County.

I don't know the actual number of qualified medical marijuana patients in Mendocino County. It is not unreasonable to believe that there may be as many as 1,000 individuals. The opponents of Measure B have defined them as, "seriously ill people." And with this definition, they appeal to your compassion to see things their way. And with this definition in mind and with our compassionate nature we will accept these 1,000 "seriously ill people" at their word. We will accept that they are the sickest people in the county and that they indeed require marijuana for their medical problems. Under current Measure G, these 1,000 sickest people in the county are entitled by law to grow 25 marijuana plants. Let us assume that these individuals are so sick that each one demands their full entitlement to grow their 25 plants. And we with our compassionate nature, under Measure G, are going to see that they grow them. According to the UDJ publication, law enforcement has stated that these marijuana plants can reach a huge size and produce as much as two pounds per plant. That means that each of these very sick people can demand and grow as much as 50 pounds of marijuana because they are so sick they require that much. Under Measure G, we believe them and allow them to grow that much because we are responsible, caring, compassionate fellow citizens. That means we allow 1,000 of the sickest people in the county to grow 50,000 pounds of marijuana (1,000 by 50 pounds per patient). That equals 25 tons of marijuana. We as responsible citizens, being compassionate, are than going to allow 1,000 of the most "seriously ill people" in the county to smoke or use 25 tons of marijuana. After all, they need it and we are going to let them smoke it this year and every year after this year. We are compassionate and we are going to see that they get it. How long are these sickest people in the county going to last when they smoke 25 tons of marijuana every year? And they do it with our blessing and encouragement. How much more compassionate can we get?

Linda Williams wrote an article published in the UDJ Dec. 26, 2007, "Examining Marijuana as Medicine." In that article, she reported the results of a Danish study previously reported August 2007. The Danish study reported, "smoking one joint causes the same lung disease as three to five tobacco cigarettes." If you equate this fact with the 1,000 sickest and "seriously ill people" smoking 25 tons of marijuana every year you come to a very serious and sobering conclusion. One thousand of the sickest people in this county would be smoking and causing the equivalent in lung disease as if they were smoking as much as 75 to 125 tons of tobacco every year. Can you imagine 1,000 of the sickest people in the county smoking as much as 125 tons of tobacco equivalent every year? and can you imagine how compassionate and enlightened we have become? All we have to do to continue being that compassionate is vote no on Measure B. If you have bought the arguments of the opponents of Measure B and are still persuaded to vote no on Measure B you will become the most compassionate soul on planet earth. But remember that if you are of that persuasion, you have not been led down a primrose path. You have been sucked down a bamboozle tube. And if you vote no on Measure B, you will not only be overly compassionate, you will have become bamboozled.

James R. Cruise, M.D.
Redwood Valley



To the Editor:

I am wondering how many residents of this county know that the medical marijuana growers are using up a great deal of our water. It takes two gallons of water for one plant per day and in the case of large mature plants it can go up to 15 gallons of water per day for one plant.

A law enforcement official has recently estimated that there are approximately 9,000 medical marijuana patients with doctor's recommendations that enable those people to grow marijuana for medical reasons.

These patients are allowed to grow 25 plants each, which means approximately 225,000 plants may be grown legally. At a minimum of two gallons of water per plant, per day (remember that the larger mature plants take more water) marijuana growers use at least 450,000 gallons of water to maintain their maximum number of plants per day. Multiply that by the typical growing time, which I was told (by a medical marijuana grower friend of mine) is roughly two months and the result is 27 million gallons of water being used by the 9000 growers in a season.

Recently, there have been more news stories about water, or, more accurately, the lack of it. I have seen "water situation," "water problem," and "water crisis" used. I would suspect that the residents of Redwood Valley would agree with the last term, since they had to make drastic cuts in their water usage last summer and fall. They would have had more water available to them if there were not so much marijuana being grown.

While it is true that this is just the tip of the iceberg as far as total marijuana growing and water usage in our county is concerned, it should be clear that passing Measure B will lower the amount of water being used for legal cultivation and leave more for growing of fruits and vegetables, flowers, everyday cleaning and personal hygiene, as well as environmental concerns, such as the destruction of salmon habitat and of native plants.

Roughly 10 percent of our county's residents may have the right to grow marijuana for medicinal reasons, but that does not mean that they should be able to deplete the water resources for the other 90 percent.

Vicki Blackburn
Ukiah

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Groups express "outrage" at phony slate mailers that imply endorsement of No on Measure B

NEWS RELEASE - YES ON B COALITION-- YesOnB@pacific.net
May 29, 2008

Leaders of the Democratic and Republican parties and a top law enforcement official issued an unusual joint statement today denouncing the No on Measure B campaign's use of phony slate mailers that imply that their groups have taken a position opposing the ballot measure on marijuana.

The 3 slate mailers, which masquerade as official endorsements when they are not, were received by Mendocino County voters during the past week. Unless the voter reads tiny print, the mailers appear that they were sent by the official Democratic party, Republican party, and a "COPS" organization of law enforcement.

The joint statement reads as follows:

We are outraged that the No on Measure campaign has purchased space on slate mailers that masquerade as official publications of recognized organizations. These mailers are a deliberate attempt to fool the voters. The voters need to know that these slate mailers are paid political advertising and do not represent the position of any official group.

The "Cops Voter Guide" does not reflect the position of law enforcement. Every law enforcement leader in Mendocino County has endorsed "YES on Measure B."
The "Republican California Voter Guide" does not reflect the position of the local Mendocino County Republican Central Committee which has endorsed "YES on Measure B."

The "Voter Information Guide for Democrats" does not reflect the position of the local Mendocino County Democratic Central Committee which has not taken a position on Measure B, but has sent out an "Official Mendocino County Democratic Voter Guide."

Signed:
Chris Dewey, Police Chief, City of Ukiah
Margie Handley, California Republican Central Committee
Jim Mastin, Chair, Mendocino County Democratic Central Committee

Each of the signers made additional comments.

Police Chief Chris Dewey said: "Every police chief in the county, the District Attorney, the Sheriff, the Highway Patrol Commander, the Ukiah Police Officers Association and the Deputy Sheriffs Association endorse Measure B. I am not aware of anyone working in law enforcement who is opposed."

Republican Margie Handley said: "It is outrageous that anyone would try to imply that the Republican Party is opposed to Measure B. In fact, the Mendocino County Republican Central Committee has endorsed "YES" on Measure B."

Democrat Jim Mastin said: "It's election time and we want every voter to become informed on the issues and then vote their conscience. Local groups send out readily identifiable slate mailers that promote positions supported and endorsed by your neighbors and friends. Unfortunately it's also the season of the phony slate mailer. They are designed to deceive, misinform, remain anonymous and do it all for the highest bidder. We encourage you to listen to your local voices."

The phony Republican slate card endorsing No on B is titled "Attention: Republicans. Election Day Voting Guide" and features large quotes from major Republican figures like Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and former Governor Pete Wilson. It was issued by California Voter Guide, 1954 W. Carson St., Torrance, CA 90501, (301) 787-6573

The phony Democratic slate card endorsing No on B is titled "Voter Information Guide for Democrats" and is issued by Voter Information Guide, 13701 Riverside Dr., #604, Sherman Oaks, CA 91423.

The phony "COPS" slate card endorsing No on B is titled "COPS Voter Guide" and has two images of a police badge. It is issued by COPS Voter Guide, 705 E. Bidwell St. #370, Folsom, CA 95630.

Yes on B Coalition spokeman Ross Liberty said that his group had received many phone calls from confused voters who had been deceived by the paid mailers into thinking that police or the local Republican party or Democratic party were opposed to Measure B.

Liberty commented: "This is just a continuation of the campaign of intentional deception that we have seen from the beginning from the No on B campaign."

"They have lied about Measure B by saying it targets medical patients and won't do anything about the large growers. They misrepresented Sheriff Allman's position in a failed attempt to claim it would be a burden on law enforcement. Their supporters have filed bogus lawsuits and stolen our signs in an effort to prevent the voice of the people from being heard and they have bought space on every phony slate mailer out there. This has all been an effort to deceive and confuse the voters. But we believe the voters won't be fooled. They are fed up with the damage commercial marijuana growing is doing to our County and they know Measure B is the best solution available," said Liberty.

Copies of the phony slate mailers can be faxed to interested media upon request to YesOnB@pacific.net.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

DON'T be fooled by More false information from No on B Campaign!!!! No on B tries to confuse voters

Save Mendocino County
NEWS RELEASE - Yes on B Coalition
May 28, 2008

The detractors of Measure B are making one last ditch effort to spread false information about the ballot initiative on marijuana.

"The last-minute claims by the No on Measure B campaign that Measure B is unconstitutional are absurd," said Yes on B Coalition spokesman Ross Liberty.

"The No on B group knows that the voters of Mendocino County are prepared to take a huge step to limit the negative effects of marijuana production," said Liberty. "The No on B campaign is desperate and they are grasping at straws to try to confuse the voters."

"The recent appellate court decision, People v. Kelly, that is cited by the No on B group is being appealed by the Attorney General to the State Supreme Court where it will likely be reversed or modified because it conflicts with previous Supreme Court decisions," said Liberty.

In particular, he cited the Supreme Court's finding in People v. Wright (2006) that upheld SB 420's approach to defining how much marijuana a medical patient can possess. Liberty pointed out that a major medical marijuana advocate, Joseph Elford, chief counsel of Oakland-based Americans for Safe Access, has said that the appeals court decision is inconsistent with People v. Wright. (see http://www.law.com/jsp/law/LawArticleFriendly.jsp?id=1202421668633)

"Regardless of how the courts and legislature set medical marijuana limits, Measure B simply says that Mendocino County's limits will be the same as the rest of the state instead of being vastly higher, as they are now. Measure B also repeals Measure G which told our law enforcement to make all marijuana laws the lowest priority," said Liberty.

"Repeal of Measure G, which made us a magnet for commercial growers, is the most important part of Measure B," according to Liberty.

The two parts of Measure B--repealing Measure G, and setting medical marijuana limits the same as the state--are "severable" under law, meaning that if either one was found illegal, the other part remains valid.

Liberty added, "For the No on B campaign to say that the appeals court decision makes Measure B unconstitutional is just silly. Since when is it unconstitutional for the voters to fix a mistake they made with Measure G by repealing it?"

"This is just a continuation of the campaign of intentional deception that we have seen from the beginning from the No on B campaign," asserted Liberty.

"They have lied about Measure B by saying it targets medical patients and won't do anything about the large growers.

They misrepresented Sheriff Allman's position in a failed attempt to claim it would be a burden on law enforcement. Their supporters have filed bogus lawsuits and stolen our signs in an effort to prevent the voice of the people from being heard and they have bought space on every phony slate mailer out there.

This has all been an effort to deceive and confuse the voters. But we believe the voters won't be fooled. They are fed up with the damage commercial marijuana growing is doing to our County and they know Measure B is the best solution available," said Liberty.

"We ask the voters to reject the desperate attempts of the No on B campaign and to pass Measure B by a large margin," urged Liberty.

Save Mendocino County

Measure B on the June ballot will provide:

-> That the amount of marijuana allowed for medical marijuana patients will be the same as the limit set by California State law.

The state limit, presently 6 mature plants and 8 ounces of processed marijuana per patient, will replace the higher 25-plant limit that has existed in Mendocino County since 2000. This will stop Mendocino County from being a “magnet" for marijuana growers who move here for quick profit.

-> That Measure G is repealed.

"Measure G ordered the sheriff to make enforcement of all marijuana laws his lowest priority, below even jaywalking. Prosecutions for less than 25 plants “per single case” was prohibited. Measure G discourages law enforcement and the Board of Supervisors from stopping abuses and threats to health and safety. Whenever the County tries to impose any limits on marijuana growing, the “no-limits” marijuana lobby threatens to sue for “violation of Measure G.”

Please send donations to

Yes On B Coalition
759 S. State Street #114
Ukiah, CA. 95482

YesOnB@pacific.net

Visit YES on Mendocino County Measure B Coalition for more information

Yes on Measure B - What's Happening?

June 3 -
Vote YES on Mendocino County Measure B

May 19 -
Last day to register to vote YES on Measure B.

Find my polling location. Enter your address and find your polling precinct and location.

Visit the Mendocino County Assessor - County Clerk - Recorder for more information.

May 7 - 7:o0pm
Measure B community forum
Location: Willits Grange.

May 5
Absentee ballots are mailed.

May 3 - 10:30am
Televised Measure B debate Coast League of Women Voters Measure B Community Forum.
Location: St. Michaels and All Angels Episcopal Church, Ft. Bragg.

May 1 - 6:00pm
Televised Measure B debate
Location: Mendocino Coast Television, Ft. Bragg

April 29 - 7:00pm
Anderson Valley Community Action Coalition
Location: Assembly of God - 14500 Highway 128 in Boonville

April 16 - 6:30pm
City Council meeting, City to vote on endorsing Measure B
Location: City Hall.

April 15 - 7:00pm
Ukiah Valley Chamber of Commerce / Candidates night
Location: City Hall.

April 14 - 6:30pm
Yes on Measure B debate
Location: City Hall.

Thank you for your support in
"Saving Mendocino County"

In our opinion

We want our county back

We've been hearing from readers that the level of outrage over marijuana growing in this county is continuing to rise.

The news of search warrants being quashed and pot growers walking away from court back to local neighborhoods to keep growing, of trucks and cars traveling up and down Highway 101 full of pot, of smart attorneys taking advantage of the mess that Measure G made of our county's desire to be fair to pot smokers and compassionate to the sick and dying, is all taking its toll.

When Measure G passed in the year 2000 the headlines in pro-marijuana publications read: "Marijuana growing legalized in Mendocino County, California!"

That is the message we sent to the world. That was not the message intended by many of the people who voted for Measure G back then and it is one we need to reverse by passing Measure B on the ballot in June.

What we're seeing in the news right now is a good example of why Measure B is so necessary. We need to return safety and sanity to our neighborhoods.

But perhaps most importantly Measure B will send a message back out into the world that Mendocino County is no longer the place to move to with your dreams of pulling in six figures a year tax free in a sweet deal made possible by the unwitting voters in Mendocino County who thought they were just giving a few local pot smokers a break.

In the coming weeks you will hear more about Measure B and you will hear from a group now organized to stop Measure B.

They will tell you Measure B will prevent medical marijuana patients from getting their medicine. False.

Measure B enacts locally the state standards for medical marijuana: six plants per patient. And remember when someone says "only six plants?" that one pot plant can be 10 to 12 feet tall and three to four feet wide. And they can have more immature plants, and they can get a doctor's recommendation if need be for even more. In other words, the state's regulations, developed by physicians committed to helping the sick and dying, concluded that six plants was plenty for any legitimate medical marijuana patient.

They will tell you Measure B criminalizes marijuana and "targets small-scale personal use growers." False.

Measure B simply reverses the excesses of Measure G, which gave everyone a license to grow as many as 25 pot plants continuously, year round, and led to the off-kilter notion that with the addition of dozens of medical marijuana cards, one could legally grow hundreds of plants anywhere in the county without fear of prosecution. That is where we stand today.

Don't let the "No on B" folks fool you. Measure B will indeed put a crimp on commercial marijuana production. They also argue that 25 plants is not a commercial growing operation. We differ. A 25-plant pot garden is not personal use. Much of that pot is being sold on the open market.

As the closure of the Ukiah medical marijuana dispensary this week showed, there are far more people growing "medical marijuana" than there are local medical marijuana patients.

If the news about the expanding commercial marijuana operations in this county disturbs you, if you support medical marijuana and even personal use, but not the outrageous abuses and the current pot traffic, then plan to vote Yes on B and make the message clear that we want our county back.

Argument in favor of Measure B

Marijuana cultivation in Mendocino County is clearly out of control. We have become a target for "no-limits" commercial marijuana growers who want quick profit and who care nothing about the impacts to our neighborhoods, our communities or the environment.

With the boom in commercial marijuana growing a crime wave has engulfed our communities. Home invasion robberies, trespassing, impacts to schools, and an influx of guns and attack dogs in residential neighborhoods are commonplace. Young people are increasingly turning to marijuana cultivation as a "career path."

Environmental damage from marijuana cultivation includes spills of diesel fuel and waste oil, dumping of trash, misuse of pesticides and fertilizers, illegal water diversion that has completely dried up some streams, poisoning of wildlife, damage to rural roads and strong odors that have sickened nearby residents.

What has caused this crisis? Much of the blame lies with Measure G, approved in 2000, that told law enforcement that all marijuana laws were the "lowest priority" for law enforcement, even lower than jaywalking.

Measure G discourages law enforcement from protecting us against even the most flagrant abuses by the commercial growers and sends a message to the nation that "marijuana is legal" in Mendocino County.

This has made us a magnet for "get-rich-quick" growers who hide behind medical marijuana as a "cover" for commercial marijuana production.

A "Yes" vote on Measure B does two simple things: it protects the rights of medical marijuana patients by adopting the same limits as state law and it repeals Measure G.

"Yes" on B tells law enforcement that we want protection against the abuses of the "no-limits" commercial growers.

"Yes" on B tells out-of-control growers that they are no longer welcome in Mendocino County.

Help save Mendocino County. Vote "Yes" on Measure B.

Duane Wells , Co-chairman, Yes on B Coalition
D.J. Miller, Co-chairman, Yes on B Coalition
Mari Rodin
Dave Bengston
Ron Orenstein

The rest of the argument

'NO ON MEASURE B' PRIMARY BALLOT ARGUMENT

Measure B is a backward step towards marijuana re-criminalization that targets small-scale, personal use growers instead of large-scale commercial operators and organized criminals who are actually causing the problems in Mendocino County.

In 2000, Mendocino County voters overwhelmingly approved Measure G, the Personal Use of Marijuana Initiative, which allows cultivation of twenty--five (25) plants or fewer for personal use only, while leaving commercial cultivation and sales illegal.

Measure B would 1) repeal Measure G so as to re-criminalize personal use growing, and 2) subject medical marijuana patients to arrest and prosecution on felony charges for growing more than six (6) plants, forcing many seriously ill people into the criminal market to get their medicine.

Mendocino County will not be made safer by cracking down on small personal use growers. Instead, it will be made less safe by diverting police resources. Sheriff Tom Allman has said that reducing patient plant guidelines to six plants would be "a burden on law enforcement" under which his deputies "will not be able to focus on any other public safety issue". (Press Democrat 3/17/07)

Mendocino County sorely needs to regulate large-scale gardens and to attack illicit grows and commercial trafficking. Measure B is a bogus diversion that does neither.

The solution is not to repeal Measure G (MCC9.36), but to seek ways to enforce it by regulating commercial growing.

If you support targeting large-scale criminal operations rather than personal use gardens, VOTE NO on B.

If you believe seriously ill patients should not be arrested for seven (7) plants, VOTE NO on B.

If you believe law enforcement has more important priorities than arresting and prosecuting small marijuana gardeners, VOTE NO on B.

If you support decriminalization of marijuana, VOTE NO on B.

B is Bad for Mendocino. Vote NO.

I swear under penalty of perjury that the above NO ON MEASURE B ballot argument is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signed by:
William L. Courtney MD
Catherine Babcock Magruder, Community Cultural Artist/Cancer Survivor
Keith Faulder, Attorney At Law
Peter Keegan MD
Lynda McClure, Union Representative
----------------------------------------------------------------

YES ON MEASURE B
REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE B

Don’t be fooled by false arguments and misleading quotations.

Measure B protects medical patients - not commercial growers.

The State recommended limits of 6 adult or 12 immature plants, plus ½ lb of marijuana, (more if physician recommended), is more than sufficient for seriously ill patients.

Sheriff Allman is neutral on Measure B, but previously said, “the problem in California is a lack of consistency in the law.” Recently, Sheriff Allman stated “Measure B will not change our focus. Investigating violent crime will remain our top priority. We do not, and will not, target small grows. We will continue to focus on large grows and complaints about growers who create a public nuisance, endanger public safety or trash the environment.”

“YES” ON B repeals Measure G which is inconsistent with state law, and makes Mendocino County a magnet for commercial growers who use medical marijuana as a cover for growing hundreds of plants.

“YES” ON B repeals G, which sanctions commercial quantities of 25 plants for everyone and tells law enforcement that ALL marijuana laws are the “lowest priority” and should not be enforced.

VOTE “YES” ON B - repeal G and end the hypocrisy that tells our kids it’s OK to break the law as long as you make money.

VOTE “YES” ON B - tell law enforcement and elected officials we want to feel safe in our homes and neighborhoods and we want our children and the environment protected from commercial growers who are motivated only by quick profit.
more information: www.YesOnBCoalition.org

s/Dave Turner, Fort Bragg City Council member
s/Karen Oslund, Willits City Council member
s/Marvin Trotter, M.D., Emergency Room Physician
s/Karin Wandrei, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mendocino County Youth Project
s/Robert Werra, M.D., Hospice Medical Advisor

FULL Text of Measure B

[Note: In response to a petition from 1,000 citizens, along with resolutions by the city councils of Ukiah and Willits, the Board of Supervisors acted on January 8, 2008 to place Measure B on the ballot at the June election for consideration by the voters.]

The People of the County of Mendocino ordain as follows:

THE REPEAL OF (MEASURE G) MENDOCINO COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 9.36 CANNABIS PERSONAL USE ORDINANCE FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY, AND ADOPTION OF NEW GUIDELINES FOR MAINTENANCE AND POSSESSION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA THAT DO NOT EXCEED THE MINIMUM STATE LIMITS.

Section 1 Purpose

The purpose of this ordinance is to eliminate the abuses created by the increased and uncontrolled production of recreational and medical marijuana while protecting the rights of legitimate medical marijuana patients and primary caregivers. It does so by repealing Measure G and establishing guidelines for possession of medical marijuana for medical purposes that are consistent with state law.

Section 2 Findings

1. On November 6, 1996, the people of the State of California enacted the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 known as Proposition 215, which permits seriously ill residents of the state, who have a doctor’s recommendation, to use or possess marijuana for medical purposes without fear of criminal liability. Proposition 215 is codified in Health and Safety Code section 11362.5.

2. On November 7, 2000, the voters of Mendocino County approved an initiative known as Measure G (administratively codified as Mendocino County Code Chapter 9.36), the stated purpose of which was to establish a maximum limit of plants and weight for cultivation and possession of marijuana for personal medical and recreational use in Mendocino County, and prohibit the expenditure of public funds for enforcement of marijuana laws against cultivators and users in possession of quantities below that limit, which was identified by the Measure as twenty-five (25) adult flowering female marijuana plants or the equivalent in dried marijuana.

3. On October 12, 2003, the Governor of the State of California signed SB 420. Codified in sections 11362.7 through 11362.83 of the Health and Safety Code, SB 420 was adopted to address implementation of Proposition 215 and to facilitate the prompt identification of qualified patients and their designated primary caregivers in order to avoid unnecessary arrest and prosecution of these individuals.

4. SB 420 establishes minimum guidelines for the maintenance and possession of medical marijuana. Health and Safety Code Section 11362.77(a)-(f) provides that a qualified patient or primary caregiver may possess no more than eight (8) ounces of dried marijuana per qualified patient and that a qualified patient or primary caregiver may also maintain no more than six (6) mature of twelve (12) immature plants per qualified patient. If a qualified patient or primary caregiver has a doctor’s recommendation that this quantity does not meet the qualified patient’s needs, the qualified patient or primary caregiver may possess an amount that is consistent with the qualified patient’s needs.

5. Health and Safety Code section 11362.77(c) allows counties and cities to retain or enact medical marijuana guidelines allowing qualified patients or primary caregivers to exceed the state limits.

6. On August 7, 2007, the Board of Supervisors, in accordance with Health and Safety Code section 11362.77(c) and recognizing the state purpose of Measure G as it related to medical use only, adopted a policy, which allowed qualified patients or primary caregivers to maintain twenty-five (25) plants and to possess no more than two (2) pounds dried marijuana per qualified patient.

7. The effect of Measure G has been to increase public safety issues surrounding the uncontrolled production of marijuana either for medical or recreational use, and has jeopardized the health, safety and welfare of the people of Mendocino County.

Section 3 Repeal of Mendocino County Code Chapter 9.36

Mendocino County Code Chapter 9.36, Cannabis Personal Use Ordinance for Mendocino County, is hereby repealed.

Section 4 Limits for Possession of Marijuana for Medical Purposes

A qualified patient or primary caregiver may possess or maintain for medical purposes only those amounts as set forth in Health and Safety Code section 11362.77 and as amended by State or Federal legislation.

Section 5 Severability

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance.